Saturday, 20 August 2022

Prove me wrong: Electronic drumkits are the best choice for most drummers!

Once I met a professional sound engineer at a music exhibition and asked him what he thinks about electronic drum kits and his response was clear:

"They suck!"

I was somewhat perplexed and told him, that I had been using e-drums for a while now on live gigs and his comment was something like:

"Well, if they work for you that is great, but I don't use them!"

Sure, from a sound engineers point of view e-drums suck, because they use samples instead of a more individual approach.

Samples are by their nature more limited than acoustic drums with more parameters one can influence.

Even if the enormous amount of high quality samples, virtual mic positioning, virtual tunings etc. provide electronic drummers with more possibilities than ever before.

While it is not possible to use electronic drum kits with specific techniques such as brush-use, the more meat-ier stuff remains largely the same.

Apart from a few very specific shortcomings however electronic drum kits offer a wide range of advances over acoustic drums.

-Portable: Often electronic drum kits use rack systems, which allow for folding the whole kit together without the need to disassemble too much gear.

See: https://www.roland.com/us/products/v-drums_portable_td-4kp/

-Space efficient: A 22x18 bass drum requires a lot of space and we have not even touched on Floor Toms or 20 inch Ride cymbals. E-drums use way less space, as your bass drum often is often just 5-10 inches in depth and 3-12 inches in diameter, while Ride cymbals often are the size of acoustic Crash cymbals.

-Highly adaptable sound: If a component of your analog drum kit is too loud or not sharp enough in its sound to cut through the wall of sound you are rather limited in your approach to fix this. With electronic drum kits you can change the volume of each component or simply select a sample that fits better with your situation.

Especially the fact, that the volume can be changed by a knob on your sound module is extremely useful, when playing in small places or when practicing with your band.

We made a huge leap forward in our cover band, when we switched to electronic drums in our rehearsal room as the more controlled sound helped us dramatically to become tighter and pay more attention to details as tiny errors became much easier to spot.

Gone are the days, where our guitarist complained about being too loud. Now he complains about having to play perfectly as otherwise you would easily hear him messing up somewhere.

Live it has been so easy to get a perfect sound and despite people having a lot of prejudice over electronic drums, I often get told how well balanced the sound is.

-More sterile sound: Often quoted a disadvantage, the more sterile sound e-drum modules make it easier to get unwanted frequencies out. For example the snare in an acoustic set creates noise, when certain resonant frequencies are hit. This does not happen with electronic drums.

-Easy control and mixing: Most sound modules these days, allow for onboard mixing, EQ, tuning, ambience, dampening etc. This makes it super easy to adjust your sound to the conditions needed within seconds.

-No microphones needed: E-drums do not need microphones as each pad is directly connected to the sound module. So just plugging in your cables into both and you are done.

-Different sounds for different songs: With the ability to switch between kits you can easily use a noisy punk sound for one song and more sterile samples for the the next industrial metal song. This allows for a wide variety of different song types.

-Easy recording for everyone: While the sound might not come close to a perfectly mastered real drum kit, directly recording your drum modules output into your audio interface gives you semi-professional results nonetheless with almost no effort at all.

Here is an example of my Roland kit:

https://on.soundcloud.com/A9gQ

Bottom Line: For most drummers not in the big studios, electronic drum kits offer great benefits and should be considered as an optimal solution for most situations.

Saturday, 13 August 2022

Making Youtube greener (and more profitable)

With the success of TikTok in recent years, Youtube saw itself under pressure and brought up its competitive format called "Youtube Shorts" with the goal to provide the platform with more short videos and animate content creators with limited (time) budget to upload videos there.

Often with little value to its audience (one can only put so much information/entertainment into a few seconds long clip), the platform further increases its need for hard drives at even higher speeds.

Especially with ever more high resolution video formats and more and more people uploading content.

Not only the resources to produce these storage mediums are huge but also the energy demands to run this system (servers, active cooling, maintenance etc.) are enormous.

Youtube (but also other platforms) could save a lot of resources with only one simple trick:

Deleting content nobody watches anymore. Such an approach would allow for a more lightweight, more profitable business, with less material and energy needed.

By applying a filter searching all videos not having received a single view for "X" amount of years and delete those.

Especially in combination with checking, whether the account that created the content is still in use.

If not, the it might be safe to get rid of all the junk files currently wasting valueable disc space.

A less radical approach is to just compress and maybe de-list the videos not being watched. In this case the content creator has the possibility to download his own content still but due the compression, more disc space is freed.

While I have no access to the Youtube database, I would assume, that this measure would allocate gigantic amounts of data storage and potentially save a lot of money and resources in general.

Deleting this quasi-dead content also has the nice side effect of restoring privacy as it adds a "right to be forgotten" function, which is often asked by various privacy focused institutions. 

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten

Despite being a logical conclusion, I have little hopes this feature will be added anytime soon, unless a competitor forces Youtube to do so. Until then resources and money will get wasted by sheer unwillingness to change for the better.

Further readings:

https://angelo-sasso.blogspot.com/2019/11/saving-ressources-in-digital-world.html